By OPTIC Politics THE MATHEMATICS OF A LIE: HOW “SYSTEMATIC MURDER” COLLAPSES UNDER ITS OWN NUMBERS OPTIC Politics | February 27, 2026 If the Prosecution wants to call the Philippine anti-drug campaign a “systematic policy of mass murder,” then it must survive the one test it cannot evade: systems analysis. Law is not theater; it is architecture. A system is judged by its design, its dominant outputs, and its institutional logic. By that standard, the narrative now being advanced before the International Criminal Court against Rodrigo Duterte fractures under scrutiny. Official tallies show approximately 1.74 million drug personalities arrested or surrendered and processed alive through police stations and rehabilitation pathways. The Prosecution elevates 76 alleged murder cases as proof of a killing policy. When measured as a system, those alleged killings amount to roughly 0.0044% of all individuals processed. That is not the statistical footprint of extermination. It is the margin of...

Common Sense “Common sense dictates that it is political persecution. Why the rendition of FPRRD without due process and without passing through Philippine Courts? Why are there no cases filed against FPRRD in Philippine Courts? Does FPRRD control Philippine Courts and the Philippine Justice System? The prosecution wants to litigate the case outside of Philippine jurisdiction because they know the evidence to support their claim of alleged crimes against humanity or it's equivalence will not support conviction under Philippine laws. Their sole purpose is to embarrass, ridicule, and tarnish the reputation of FPRRD, to remove the Dutertes from the Philippine political equation. The prosecution witnesses, their benefactors and their sponsors are manipulating the EJK Victims families through this ICC case as a tool to achieve their political agenda.” JUSTICE NOEL G. TIJAM SUPREME COURT ASSOCIATE JUSTICE (RETIRED)

Lifted from Kitty Duterte Unofficial  

28 February 2026   The  CSPC Performing Arts  (Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges), particularly the  CSPC Dance Troupe  and  Majorettes , are  active cultural groups in Nabua, Philippines . They perform at school events, career guidance activities, and local arts festivals, showcasing routines even during challenging conditions like rain. The group is associated with the  CSPC Center for Rinconada Culture and the Arts .   Facebook  +3 Key Details: Active Groups:  Dance Troupe (CDT), Majorettes. Recent Events:  2026 Art Fair performances at CSPC Villafuerte Hall. Focus:  Cultural representation, school performances, and student, specifically at Nabua National High School. Social Media:  Updates are shared on the  CSPC Performing Arts - Dance Troupe Facebook page .  

CTTO

3 days Case Confirmation at the Hague

By Rob Rances I agree strongly. That’s basic principle of justice: you do not distort accountability by selectively protecting some alleged killers simply to secure one high-profile target. If the process tolerates selective prosecution, then it not impartial justice, and it starts looking like a politically curated case. Truth must be pursued consistently, not strategically. Otherwise, the prosecution risks proving not moral seriousness, but moral convenience.

By Maharahnee Marieta Mindanao Adam February 25-27, 2026 📌Three days. One courtroom. One principle. Calm. Measured. Disciplined. 👉🏻Atty. Nicholas Kaufman stood, not with noise, but with the power of law itself. He reminded the world: the ICC is a court of last resort. It asks only one question: Is the nation’s own justice system willing and able to act? Not speeches. Not narratives. Not politics. Truth is tested in evidence. Justice is measured in process. For three days, hope came quietly: in composure, in precision, and in the architecture of law. And this is the law speaking: When a nation’s courts function, when its Constitution stands, the first right to judge remains with its people. 🇵🇭⚖️ Tatay Digong is not alone. We are here. Our prayers, our respect, our vigilance — for law, for sovereignty, for justice. 👉🏻For three days we listened not as a partisan, but as a student of law and sovereignty — watching how international justice measures its own limits. In the proceedings...

By Daily Chronicle    In women’s tennis, stardom has traditionally followed trophies, rankings, and Grand Slam tallies. Alexandra Eala is breaking that order.

By Duoi Ampilan OMG! Mt. Kanlaon erupted this evening few minutes after 7:00 PM February 26. Di pa tayo tapos sa patuloy na pagputok ng Mt Mayon ay heto na naman ang Kanlaon Volcano ng Negros Island. Photo by Ethan Asentista

By Optic Politics The Affidavit Exposes ICC Deception: How Prosecutors Twisted Truth Against Duterte OPTIC Politics | February 26, 2026 On February 23, 2026, the International Criminal Court, under Prosecutor Julian Nicholls, attempted to weaponize a video recording against former President Rodrigo Duterte, presenting it to a global audience as evidence of extrajudicial killings allegedly ignored by the Philippine leader. Yet the sworn affidavit of Davao journalist Ben Jason Tesiorna exposes this narrative as a deliberate, reckless, and legally indefensible distortion. Tesiorna’s affidavit details that he recorded the footage on December 19, 2013, during a media demonstration of Davao City’s newly installed Central 911 CCTV system. The purpose of this recording was straightforward: to showcase the system’s ability to capture incidents clearly, both in real time and for review. The footage was archival, not a live crime scene. No killings occurred during the demonstration. Police office...

Lifted from 25 February 2026 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐂𝐂 𝐡𝐨𝐚𝐱: 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡 ‘𝐰𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐄𝐉𝐊𝐬’ 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞 𝐯𝐬 𝐃𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐞 February 23, 2026 | Read time: 9 minutes THE International Criminal Court’s (ICC) case against former president Rodrigo Duterte is an abomination and a huge, horrific hoax. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. will go down in history as more ruthless than his dictator father, in his turning over of a frail 79-year-old former president who cracked down on illegal drugs to a sovereign entity, on false charges. He could have asked the Supreme Court to rule first on the constitutionality of surrendering a former — and extremely popular — president to a foreign entity. He instead ordered Nicolas Torre, his thug disguised as a police official, to forcibly bring the former president to the ICC, hoping that Duterte’s disappearance would dissipate his political base. Now, Marcos and the ICC appear to be intent on further trampling on our sovereignty...

Lifted Statement of Rep. Paolo Duterte Frankly, I do not know whether the ICC prosecutors are simply incompetent—or deliberately pretending to be blind because they are being guided by handlers here in the Philippines who are just as desperate as they are. Every time they roll out so-called “evidence,” it is the same recycled script– old testimonies, twisted narratives, and edited videos carefully shaped to fit their predetermined story against President Rodrigo Duterte. The video they relied on has already been publicly debunked by its own owner. It was taken out of context, distorted, and reinterpreted just so they could present something—anything—to the ICC.  And when the truth came out? Silence. No apology. No accountability. Is this justice—or trial by imagination? Now we hear allegations from former soldiers claiming that 2 million US dollars were allegedly handed out for ICC “expenses,” and once again, the same familiar political parasites appear–Asong Ulol Trililing and the...

Lifted from Transcript of Defense’ Lead Counsel Nicholas Kaufman   Opening Statement   Confirmation of Charges   23 February 2026      Mr. Cawthron, please. And I thank Mr. Butuyan for his intervention, but I feel that I ought to remind him that this is a court of law which decides matters on the basis of evidence, not on the basis of political demagoguery and not on the basis of a desire to affect regime change despite the democratic will. And certainly not on the basis of statements made by ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla, who professed that domestic justice would be denied, according to Mr. Butuyan, because of the lack of forensic reports and police reports.      Now, I don't know which case Mr. Butuyan's metaphorical ship sailed into, but he clearly hasn't read the evidence. Whilst he was speaking, we examined the evidence and out of that evidence, we found at least 35 reports substantiating 49 of the incidents wh...

Lifted from FEBRUARY 24, 2026. MANILA. Teddy Adarna The timing could not have been more surgical. On the morning of February 23, 2026, the International Criminal Court opened its confirmation of charges hearing against former President Rodrigo Duterte in The Hague. 24 hours later Eighteen former Marines marched forward with claims so staggering they could swallow the news cycle whole: that they personally delivered P805 billion in cash in suitcases, counted bag by bag inside a Valle Verde mansion. That they exchanged $2 million in funds allegedly intended for ICC investigators. That former senator Antonio Trillanes IV one of the most visible advocates for ICC accountability was handed money to manage the tribunal’s investigators on Philippine soil. That the entire shadow economy of corruption ran through one node: fugitive ex-congressman Zaldy Co, now hiding abroad, with Interpol on his trail and billions allegedly on his conscience. The Philippines did not just wake up to a corruption...

Lifted from Sass Rogando Sasot 25 February 2026 "By accepting the possibility of dying in an ICC cell, Duterte completes this transformation. He ceases to be a defendant seeking justice from the court and becomes, in the eyes of his followers and for the historical record he is a martyr. He is a martyr not for a policy, but for the cause of sovereignty itself, for the principle that a leader’s fate should be decided by his people, not by a distant court backed by global power. The court, in its attempt to avoid being a show trial by giving him a voice, has allowed him to stage a counter-trial. And the final verdict in that counter-trial will not be delivered by the judges in The Hague. It will be rendered by a future generation, looking back at a man who, when placed before the bar of international opinion, refused to plead, refused to recognize the court, and declared his peace from within its own prison walls. In that act of total rupture, he has ensured that his story will outl...

Lifted from Pungkols In The confirmation of charges hearing against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague began on February 23, 2026, marking a key phase in the case related to alleged crimes against humanity during his administration's war on drugs. During the proceedings, Nicholas Kaufman, Duterte's lead defense counsel, delivered a pointed opening statement that not only defended his client but also directly criticized current President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. Kaufman portrayed Duterte as a "unique phenomenon" in Philippine politics—passionate, straightforward, and a man whose word was his bond, earning public trust through his consistent style. He drew a sharp contrast with Marcos, accusing the current administration of reneging on earlier promises of non-cooperation with the ICC. Kaufman referenced a prior statement from Marcos (including a December 2023 letter) declaring that the gove...

Opticsl Politics 20 February 2026 EDITORIAL | Duterte Defies ICC Authority, Calls Arrest ‘Kidnapping’ as Philippines’ Role Comes Under Fire OPTIC Politics | February 20, 2026 Rodrigo Duterte’s request to waive his attendance at the ICC confirmation hearing was not an act of weakness. It was an act of strategy. In one procedural stroke, he exposed three uncomfortable truths: the prosecution’s contempt for the rights of the accused, the political character of his transfer to The Hague, and the quiet complicity of the Philippine state in what he now calls an abduction dressed as law. This was not a medical plea. It was not a retreat. It was a legal provocation. By seeking to waive his presence before the hearing even begins, Duterte forced the prosecution to reveal its posture in advance: it insisted on his physical or virtual attendance despite full knowledge of his age and documented frailty. The law does not demand performative cruelty. The Rome Statute allows waiver at the confirmatio...